trié(s) par (Pertinence décroissant(e), Titre croissant(e)) 

Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space / A. Bonfiglio in Journal of rural studies, vol. 53 (01/07/2017)  

Public ISBD Aucun avis sur cette notice. [article]  inJournal of rural studies > vol. 53 (01/07/2017) . - p. 78-87 Titre : Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : A. Bonfiglio ; S. Coderoni ; B. Camaioni Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 78-87 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement rural Mots-clés : KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER  TRANSFERT DE CONNAISSANCES  INNOVATION  INNOVATION  RURAL DEVELOPMENT  REGIONAL ANALYSIS  ANALYSE REGIONALE  SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION  DISTRIBUTION SPATIALE  EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES  PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE  05 - DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL  5.1 - Développement Résumé : Knowledge transfer and innovation (KT&I) are vital for sustainable rural development. European Rural Development Policy (RDP) has a long tradition of stimulating innovation in the rural space. In particular, in the 2007–2013 programming period, some measures have been explicitly targeted to support KT&I in agriculture and in rural economies. This paper aims to analyse the spatial distribution of the actual expenditure for measures promoting KT&I across the EU over the 2007–2011 period. In order to describe the main differences affecting the territorial allocation of this support, differences at rural development programming level are firstly taken into account. Then, the paper assesses “local” differences, i.e. those concerning the expenditure intensity at the NUTS 3 level. Findings point to an uneven and sometime low uptake of available opportunities. Imbalances come from both top-down political decisions and bottom-up capacity to attract and spend EU funds. In contrast with RDP objectives, the remotest and the most agricultural EU regions tend to show a lower expenditure intensity for KT&I measures. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248111 [article] Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / A. Bonfiglio ; S. Coderoni ; B. Camaioni . - 2017 . - p. 78-87. Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) in Journal of rural studies > vol. 53 (01/07/2017) . - p. 78-87 Catégories : F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement rural Mots-clés : KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER  TRANSFERT DE CONNAISSANCES  INNOVATION  INNOVATION  RURAL DEVELOPMENT  REGIONAL ANALYSIS  ANALYSE REGIONALE  SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION  DISTRIBUTION SPATIALE  EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES  PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE  05 - DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL  5.1 - Développement Résumé : Knowledge transfer and innovation (KT&I) are vital for sustainable rural development. European Rural Development Policy (RDP) has a long tradition of stimulating innovation in the rural space. In particular, in the 2007–2013 programming period, some measures have been explicitly targeted to support KT&I in agriculture and in rural economies. This paper aims to analyse the spatial distribution of the actual expenditure for measures promoting KT&I across the EU over the 2007–2011 period. In order to describe the main differences affecting the territorial allocation of this support, differences at rural development programming level are firstly taken into account. Then, the paper assesses “local” differences, i.e. those concerning the expenditure intensity at the NUTS 3 level. Findings point to an uneven and sometime low uptake of available opportunities. Imbalances come from both top-down political decisions and bottom-up capacity to attract and spend EU funds. In contrast with RDP objectives, the remotest and the most agricultural EU regions tend to show a lower expenditure intensity for KT&I measures. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248111

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)