Accueil
|
Exemplaires
| Code-barres | Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aucun exemplaire | |||||
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panierBetween aspirations and reality: making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable / K. Knickel in Journal of rural studies, vol. 59 (01/04/2018)
Titre : Between aspirations and reality: making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : K. Knickel ; E. Rogge ; A. Ashkenazy ; I. Darnhofer ; M. Redman Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p.197-210 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agroéconomie:Développement agricole ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Politique et gouvernement:Gouvernement:Administration publique:Gouvernance Manner in which power and authority are exercised by both public and private bodies; includes such issues as public sector management, legal framework, accountability and transparency.; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement ruralMots-clés : AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT FARMING SYSTEM SYSTEME DE PRODUCTION RESILIENCE RESILIENCE AGROFOOD SYSTEM SYSTEME AGROALIMENTAIRE INNOVATION INNOVATION GOVERNANCE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : This paper explores the connections between farm modernisation, rural development and the resilience of agricultural and rural systems. The paper starts by ascertaining why agricultural and food systems need to change systemically. Evidence from case studies in fourteen countries is used to explore the possibilities for, and drivers and limitations of systemic change in four thematic areas: the resilience of farms and rural areas; prosperity and well-being; knowledge and innovation, and; the governance of agriculture and rural areas. In each area, we identify a major mismatch between visions and strategies on the one hand, and market developments, policy measures and outcomes on the other. The first theme is of growing concern as there has been an observable decrease in the social-ecological resilience of farms and of rural communities in recent decades. The second theme emerges as important as the concentration of production in some regions or some farms is directly linked to the marginalisation of others. The third theme illustrates that local farmer-driven innovations can teach us much, especially since farmers focus on efficiently using the resources available to them, including their location-specific experiential knowledge. Through the final theme we show that informal networks can balance different interests and approaches, which is essential for integrated rural development strategies and projects. Our findings in these four thematic areas have implications for the strategic frameworks and policy of the EU (and beyond) and future research agendas. We explicitly draw these out. The 14 case studies show that practitioners, grassroots initiatives and pilot programmes are already generating a wealth of experiences and knowledge that could be fruitfully used to inform higher-level policy development. The paper concludes that systemic change requires more critical reflection of conventional wisdom and approaches, and openness to ideas and practices that are outside the mainstream. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.012 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248115
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p.197-210[article] Between aspirations and reality: making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / K. Knickel ; E. Rogge ; A. Ashkenazy ; I. Darnhofer ; M. Redman . - 2018 . - p.197-210.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p.197-210
Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agroéconomie:Développement agricole ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Politique et gouvernement:Gouvernement:Administration publique:Gouvernance Manner in which power and authority are exercised by both public and private bodies; includes such issues as public sector management, legal framework, accountability and transparency.; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement ruralMots-clés : AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT FARMING SYSTEM SYSTEME DE PRODUCTION RESILIENCE RESILIENCE AGROFOOD SYSTEM SYSTEME AGROALIMENTAIRE INNOVATION INNOVATION GOVERNANCE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : This paper explores the connections between farm modernisation, rural development and the resilience of agricultural and rural systems. The paper starts by ascertaining why agricultural and food systems need to change systemically. Evidence from case studies in fourteen countries is used to explore the possibilities for, and drivers and limitations of systemic change in four thematic areas: the resilience of farms and rural areas; prosperity and well-being; knowledge and innovation, and; the governance of agriculture and rural areas. In each area, we identify a major mismatch between visions and strategies on the one hand, and market developments, policy measures and outcomes on the other. The first theme is of growing concern as there has been an observable decrease in the social-ecological resilience of farms and of rural communities in recent decades. The second theme emerges as important as the concentration of production in some regions or some farms is directly linked to the marginalisation of others. The third theme illustrates that local farmer-driven innovations can teach us much, especially since farmers focus on efficiently using the resources available to them, including their location-specific experiential knowledge. Through the final theme we show that informal networks can balance different interests and approaches, which is essential for integrated rural development strategies and projects. Our findings in these four thematic areas have implications for the strategic frameworks and policy of the EU (and beyond) and future research agendas. We explicitly draw these out. The 14 case studies show that practitioners, grassroots initiatives and pilot programmes are already generating a wealth of experiences and knowledge that could be fruitfully used to inform higher-level policy development. The paper concludes that systemic change requires more critical reflection of conventional wisdom and approaches, and openness to ideas and practices that are outside the mainstream. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.012 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248115
Titre : Cooperation and competition among agricultural advisory service providers. The case of pesticides use Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : C. Compagnone ; B. Simon Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 10-20 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire de l'Europe:Europe occidentale:France ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Administration et gestion:Entreprise:Coopérative:Coopérative agricole ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Finances et commerce:Commerce:Marché:Structure du marché:Concurrence économique ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Matériaux et produits:Produit chimique:Produit phytochimique:Pesticide Mots-clés : PESTICIDES ECONOMIC COMPETITION COORDINATION COORDINATION CHAMBER OF AGRICULTURE CHAMBRE D'AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES CONSEIL AGRICOLE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.6 - Technique Agricole (sols, engrais, mécanisation) Note de contenu : Highlights :
A new equilibrium between cooperation and competition appears in the relationships among advisory organizations.
The two organizations we focused on are the most strongly interconnected organizations in the area of Burgundian Bresse.
They are constrained to cooperate in order to respond to State requirements and to achieve goals they can't accomplish alone.
Competition takes place mainly within the context of individual advisory services based on front-office activities.
Cooperation is found mainly in activities of small-group advisory services, and in activities to produce resource materials.En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.01.006 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248121
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 10-20[article] Cooperation and competition among agricultural advisory service providers. The case of pesticides use [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / C. Compagnone ; B. Simon . - 2018 . - p. 10-20.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 10-20
Titre : Local and farmers' knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : S. Sumane ; I. Kunda ; K. Knickel ; A. Strauss ; T. Tisenkopfs ; I. Des Ios Rios ; M. Rivera ; T. Chebach ; A. Ashkenazy Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 232-241 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Zone rurale:Population rurale:Agriculteur ; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:Indigenous knowledge ; G ENSEIGNEMENT - EDUCATION:G.12 Sciences de l'éducation et environnement:Apprentissage Mots-clés : CONNAISSANCE INDIGENE FARMERS APPRENTICESHIP NETWORK RESEAU SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE RESILIENCE RESILIENCE 12 - EDUCATION. FORMATION. INFORMATION. GESTION DES SAVOIRS 12.2 - Gestion des Savoirs Résumé : The widespread transformations in farming practices during recent decades across many parts of Europe – increased capital intensity, scale enlargement, specialization, intensification and mechanization have been accompanied by a quite dramatic shift towards more standardized agricultural information and knowledge. Previous research reveals that transition towards more sustainable agriculture requires a new knowledge base, with new content and forms of knowledge and new processes of learning. In this paper, we explore the relevance of informal farmer knowledge and learning practices in constructing alternative pathways in sustainable agriculture and strengthening agricultural resilience. It is based on 11 case studies carried out within the international RETHINK research programme. The cases reveal the diversity of knowledge sources and learning forms that farmers use and the particular role of farmers’ experience-based knowledge. Farmers greatly value local experiential knowledge as they see it as having practical, personal and local relevance. Given the limitations of more standardized information and knowledge, and the urgent need for a transition towards more sustainable and resource-efficient practices, we argue that the potential of local farmer knowledge is not being optimally used and that a better integration of various forms of knowledge is needed. We identify several ways in which different kinds of knowledge can be integrated. For the individual farmer this can be done by synthesising knowledge from different sources. It can also be done through farmer networking – whether or not facilitated by formal agricultural knowledge institutions, through collaboration between farmers and researchers as knowledge co-generators, and through multi-actor knowledge networks that bring together participants from various fields. We conclude that the dynamic contexts, complexity and the local specificity of the current challenges facing agriculture and the many roles it is being asked to fulfil require more inclusive, flexible modes of governing the generation, integration and sharing of knowledge. All stakeholders, including farmers, need to be recognised as equal co-authors of knowledge generation, and all kinds of knowledge, both formal and informal, need be brought together in innovation processes. Knowledge networking and multi-actor knowledge networks that facilitate knowledge exchanges, joint learning and the generation of new more integrated solutions, are crucial if agriculture is to become sustainable and resilient. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248166
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 232-241[article] Local and farmers' knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / S. Sumane ; I. Kunda ; K. Knickel ; A. Strauss ; T. Tisenkopfs ; I. Des Ios Rios ; M. Rivera ; T. Chebach ; A. Ashkenazy . - 2018 . - p. 232-241.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 232-241
Catégories : F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Zone rurale:Population rurale:Agriculteur ; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:Indigenous knowledge ; G ENSEIGNEMENT - EDUCATION:G.12 Sciences de l'éducation et environnement:Apprentissage Mots-clés : CONNAISSANCE INDIGENE FARMERS APPRENTICESHIP NETWORK RESEAU SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE RESILIENCE RESILIENCE 12 - EDUCATION. FORMATION. INFORMATION. GESTION DES SAVOIRS 12.2 - Gestion des Savoirs Résumé : The widespread transformations in farming practices during recent decades across many parts of Europe – increased capital intensity, scale enlargement, specialization, intensification and mechanization have been accompanied by a quite dramatic shift towards more standardized agricultural information and knowledge. Previous research reveals that transition towards more sustainable agriculture requires a new knowledge base, with new content and forms of knowledge and new processes of learning. In this paper, we explore the relevance of informal farmer knowledge and learning practices in constructing alternative pathways in sustainable agriculture and strengthening agricultural resilience. It is based on 11 case studies carried out within the international RETHINK research programme. The cases reveal the diversity of knowledge sources and learning forms that farmers use and the particular role of farmers’ experience-based knowledge. Farmers greatly value local experiential knowledge as they see it as having practical, personal and local relevance. Given the limitations of more standardized information and knowledge, and the urgent need for a transition towards more sustainable and resource-efficient practices, we argue that the potential of local farmer knowledge is not being optimally used and that a better integration of various forms of knowledge is needed. We identify several ways in which different kinds of knowledge can be integrated. For the individual farmer this can be done by synthesising knowledge from different sources. It can also be done through farmer networking – whether or not facilitated by formal agricultural knowledge institutions, through collaboration between farmers and researchers as knowledge co-generators, and through multi-actor knowledge networks that bring together participants from various fields. We conclude that the dynamic contexts, complexity and the local specificity of the current challenges facing agriculture and the many roles it is being asked to fulfil require more inclusive, flexible modes of governing the generation, integration and sharing of knowledge. All stakeholders, including farmers, need to be recognised as equal co-authors of knowledge generation, and all kinds of knowledge, both formal and informal, need be brought together in innovation processes. Knowledge networking and multi-actor knowledge networks that facilitate knowledge exchanges, joint learning and the generation of new more integrated solutions, are crucial if agriculture is to become sustainable and resilient. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248166
Titre : Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions: findings from fourteen case studies Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : A. Ashkenazy ; R. Offenbach ; S. Peter ; K. Knickel ; T. Chebach Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 211-221 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agroéconomie:Développement agricole ; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement rural Mots-clés : RESILIENCE RESILIENCE FARMS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE FARMER BEHAVIOUR COMPORTEMENT DES AGRICULTEURS AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT ADAPTATION ADAPTATION EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : The limited resilience of agricultural and food systems, and of rural communities, has become an important concern in rural and agricultural policy. However, while the term has been heavily theorised and discussed, particularly in the natural and environmental sciences, it is sufficiently ambiguous to support divergent and even contradictory policy goals and farmers' strategies. This paper focuses on the more encompassing notion of social-ecological resilience and contends that among the causes of this divergence are the disparate spatial and temporal scales used to assess and plan enhancing resilience. Based on empirical evidence, we show that strategies that may increase farmers' abilities to persist in a difficult economic environment may undermine the resilience of the wider region, while decisions that enhance farmers’ resilience in the short term may lock them onto a path that weakens their future resilience. Using case studies from 14 different countries across Europe and beyond, we address two main questions. Firstly, how the notion of resilience is being operationalised at a farm or regional level. That is to say, what are the different strategies that farmers, rural residents and other decision-makers in rural areas are using to enhance resilience? Secondly, we look at how the outcomes of implementing these strategies vary according to spatial and temporal factors. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.008 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248177
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 211-221[article] Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions: findings from fourteen case studies [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / A. Ashkenazy ; R. Offenbach ; S. Peter ; K. Knickel ; T. Chebach . - 2018 . - p. 211-221.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 211-221
Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agroéconomie:Développement agricole ; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement rural Mots-clés : RESILIENCE RESILIENCE FARMS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE FARMER BEHAVIOUR COMPORTEMENT DES AGRICULTEURS AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT ADAPTATION ADAPTATION EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : The limited resilience of agricultural and food systems, and of rural communities, has become an important concern in rural and agricultural policy. However, while the term has been heavily theorised and discussed, particularly in the natural and environmental sciences, it is sufficiently ambiguous to support divergent and even contradictory policy goals and farmers' strategies. This paper focuses on the more encompassing notion of social-ecological resilience and contends that among the causes of this divergence are the disparate spatial and temporal scales used to assess and plan enhancing resilience. Based on empirical evidence, we show that strategies that may increase farmers' abilities to persist in a difficult economic environment may undermine the resilience of the wider region, while decisions that enhance farmers’ resilience in the short term may lock them onto a path that weakens their future resilience. Using case studies from 14 different countries across Europe and beyond, we address two main questions. Firstly, how the notion of resilience is being operationalised at a farm or regional level. That is to say, what are the different strategies that farmers, rural residents and other decision-makers in rural areas are using to enhance resilience? Secondly, we look at how the outcomes of implementing these strategies vary according to spatial and temporal factors. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.008 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248177
Titre : Rethinking the links between farm modernisation, rural development and resilience Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : H. Bjørkhaug ; K. Knickel Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 194-196 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agroéconomie:Développement agricole ; D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE:Systèmes sociaux:Milieu social:Changement social:Modernisation Process of change in a society or social institution in which the most recent ways, ideas or styles are adapted or acquired.; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement ruralMots-clés : FARMS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE MODERNIZATION AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT RESILIENCE RESILIENCE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : The six articles in this special issue explore alternative pathways of agricultural modernisation. The authors argue that such pathways, and the strategies needed to embark on them, are commonly overlooked in policy and the formal agricultural knowledge and information system which tend to concentrate on the conventional, unilinear, modernisation trajectory that involves scale-enlargement, specialisation and, more and more, digitalisation. The focus of these papers is on development strategies that can increase the resilience of farms, the agricultural and agri-food sectors and rural areas, and that can enhance the prosperity and well-being of farmers and rural communities, issues of growing importance. The papers set out what these alternative strategies might mean for the future of farming, and how we might move towards them. Four theoretical, but also practical, issues that will influence this transition play a key role here: resilience, prosperity and well-being, governance and the role of knowledge and learning. All six articles are based on empirical work carried out as part of the transdisciplinary research project RETHINK, which was supported by the European Commission and funding bodies in 14 countries under FP7 and the RURAGRI ERA-NET (CA 235175). En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.018 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248185
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 194-196[article] Rethinking the links between farm modernisation, rural development and resilience [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / H. Bjørkhaug ; K. Knickel . - 2018 . - p. 194-196.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 194-196
Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agroéconomie:Développement agricole ; D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE:Systèmes sociaux:Milieu social:Changement social:Modernisation Process of change in a society or social institution in which the most recent ways, ideas or styles are adapted or acquired.; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement ruralMots-clés : FARMS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE MODERNIZATION AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT RESILIENCE RESILIENCE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : The six articles in this special issue explore alternative pathways of agricultural modernisation. The authors argue that such pathways, and the strategies needed to embark on them, are commonly overlooked in policy and the formal agricultural knowledge and information system which tend to concentrate on the conventional, unilinear, modernisation trajectory that involves scale-enlargement, specialisation and, more and more, digitalisation. The focus of these papers is on development strategies that can increase the resilience of farms, the agricultural and agri-food sectors and rural areas, and that can enhance the prosperity and well-being of farmers and rural communities, issues of growing importance. The papers set out what these alternative strategies might mean for the future of farming, and how we might move towards them. Four theoretical, but also practical, issues that will influence this transition play a key role here: resilience, prosperity and well-being, governance and the role of knowledge and learning. All six articles are based on empirical work carried out as part of the transdisciplinary research project RETHINK, which was supported by the European Commission and funding bodies in 14 countries under FP7 and the RURAGRI ERA-NET (CA 235175). En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.018 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248185
Titre : Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development pathways Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : K. De Roest ; P. Ferrari ; K. Knickel Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 222-231 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : PRODUCTION SPECIALIZATION SPECIALISATION INTENSIVE FARMING AGRICULTURE INTENSIVE ECONOMY OF SCALE ECONOMIE D'ECHELLE RESILIENCE RESILIENCE DIVERSIFICATION DIVERSIFICATION SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : For decades agricultural development has been led by a modernisation paradigm based on specialisation, intensification and scale enlargement. This model of development model has been supported by means of price support policies and, often, strong central marketing agencies, which had a stabilising effect on prices and significantly reduced market risks for an array of commodities. The economic rationale of this model is based on the pursuit of economies of scale and highly efficient technical production. This model has led farmers to increasing their technical capacity and to neglect activities such as marketing, which was delegated to specialised marketing agencies. In this paper we argue that such specialisation has weakened the economic resilience of farms. Although a high level of specialisation allows farmers to be technically efficient, acquire highly specific production skills and apply the latest production techniques, it also leads specialised farms to be highly dependent on the commodity market(s) in which they operate, increasing their economic vulnerability. As markets have become deregulated, prices of both inputs and produce have become more volatile, often compromising the economic sustainability of these specialised farms. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.013 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248199
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 222-231[article] Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development pathways [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / K. De Roest ; P. Ferrari ; K. Knickel . - 2018 . - p. 222-231.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 222-231
Mots-clés : PRODUCTION SPECIALIZATION SPECIALISATION INTENSIVE FARMING AGRICULTURE INTENSIVE ECONOMY OF SCALE ECONOMIE D'ECHELLE RESILIENCE RESILIENCE DIVERSIFICATION DIVERSIFICATION SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production Résumé : For decades agricultural development has been led by a modernisation paradigm based on specialisation, intensification and scale enlargement. This model of development model has been supported by means of price support policies and, often, strong central marketing agencies, which had a stabilising effect on prices and significantly reduced market risks for an array of commodities. The economic rationale of this model is based on the pursuit of economies of scale and highly efficient technical production. This model has led farmers to increasing their technical capacity and to neglect activities such as marketing, which was delegated to specialised marketing agencies. In this paper we argue that such specialisation has weakened the economic resilience of farms. Although a high level of specialisation allows farmers to be technically efficient, acquire highly specific production skills and apply the latest production techniques, it also leads specialised farms to be highly dependent on the commodity market(s) in which they operate, increasing their economic vulnerability. As markets have become deregulated, prices of both inputs and produce have become more volatile, often compromising the economic sustainability of these specialised farms. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.013 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248199
Titre : The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : M.E. Koopmans ; E. Rogge ; E. Mettepenningen ; K. Knickel ; S. Sumane Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 252-262 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE:Systèmes sociaux:Milieu social:Changement social:Modernisation Process of change in a society or social institution in which the most recent ways, ideas or styles are adapted or acquired.; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement ruralMots-clés : RURAL DEVELOPMENT FARMS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE MODERNIZATION TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE GOUVERNANCE TERRITORIALE COORDINATION COORDINATION SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 05 - DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL 5.1 - Développement Résumé : The Common Agricultural Policy can be seen as a partial success story because it has resulted in increased food production at reasonable prices for consumers. However, its main focus was on agricultural productivity and economic growth. Although recent CAP reforms have led to better integration of agricultural and rural policies there is a need for more recognition of the role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization with sustainable rural development. In this paper we explore how multi-actor governance systems are being implemented and the limiting and enabling factors involved. Our analysis is based on eleven case studies carried out as part of the trans-disciplinary RETHINK research programme. In this paper we first identify five strategies that we interpret as responses to the challenge of reconnecting farm modernization and sustainable rural development. Based on the experience within these strategies we discuss six vital conditions that cut across these different strategies: they include the role of informal networks, effective coordination, polycentricity, bottom-up initiatives, agency and trust and transparency. Although most of these conditions are recognized by the scientific world, in practice they are rarely translated into effective policy strategies to support territorial development. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248213
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 252-262[article] The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / M.E. Koopmans ; E. Rogge ; E. Mettepenningen ; K. Knickel ; S. Sumane . - 2018 . - p. 252-262.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of rural studies > vol. 59 (01/04/2018) . - p. 252-262
Catégories : D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE:Systèmes sociaux:Milieu social:Changement social:Modernisation Process of change in a society or social institution in which the most recent ways, ideas or styles are adapted or acquired.; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:D SOCIOLOGIE - ETHNOLOGIE - ANTHROPOLOGIE :4.45 Etablissements humains et utilisation des terres:Développement ruralMots-clés : RURAL DEVELOPMENT FARMS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE MODERNIZATION TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE GOUVERNANCE TERRITORIALE COORDINATION COORDINATION SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES PAYS DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE 05 - DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL 5.1 - Développement Résumé : The Common Agricultural Policy can be seen as a partial success story because it has resulted in increased food production at reasonable prices for consumers. However, its main focus was on agricultural productivity and economic growth. Although recent CAP reforms have led to better integration of agricultural and rural policies there is a need for more recognition of the role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization with sustainable rural development. In this paper we explore how multi-actor governance systems are being implemented and the limiting and enabling factors involved. Our analysis is based on eleven case studies carried out as part of the trans-disciplinary RETHINK research programme. In this paper we first identify five strategies that we interpret as responses to the challenge of reconnecting farm modernization and sustainable rural development. Based on the experience within these strategies we discuss six vital conditions that cut across these different strategies: they include the role of informal networks, effective coordination, polycentricity, bottom-up initiatives, agency and trust and transparency. Although most of these conditions are recognized by the scientific world, in practice they are rarely translated into effective policy strategies to support territorial development. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=248213
