Accueil
|
Exemplaires
| Code-barres | Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aucun exemplaire | |||||
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panierLife Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system / C. Lamnatou in Science of the Total Environment, vol. 808 (20 February 2022)
Titre : Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : C. Lamnatou ; L.M. Plà-Aragonés ; D. Chemisana ; X. Ezcurra-Ciaurriz Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 1-17 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire de l'Europe:Europe occidentale:Espagne ; A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agronomie:Culture du sol:Production alimentaire ; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:Environmental impact ; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Biologie:Cycle de vie Mots-clés : 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production LIFE CYCLE LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS ANALYSE DU CYCLE DE VIE FARMING SYSTEM SYSTEME DE PRODUCTION FOOD PRODUCTION SWINE PORCIN HAMS JAMBON EXTENSIVE FARMING AGRICULTURE EXTENSIVE EXTENSIVE HUSBANDRY ELEVAGE EXTENSIF IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT SPAIN Résumé : Taking into account that in the literature on pork-production Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) there are a few studies about the Iberian pig, the present article evaluates an extensive (growing-fattening) Iberian-pig system in Spain, producing meat for Iberian ham and other quality-labelled products. The study has been based on Cumulative Energy Demand (CED), Global Warming Potential (GWP), ReCiPe (midpoint; endpoint) and USEtox (human toxicity; ecotoxicity). The analysis involves feed (for pigs and piglets), transportation, drinking water, straw usage and building materials (concrete). The impacts have been evaluated per kg of live or carcass weight (two functional units). The results show that the total impacts (per kg of live or carcass weight) range from: 1) 22.05 to 28.19 MJprim (CED), 2) 4.37 to 6.19 kg CO2.eq (GWP 20a, 100a and 500a), 3) 0.86 to 1.08 Pts (ReCiPe endpoint single-score, involving Human health, Ecosystems and Resources), 4) 9.9 * 10−6 to 1.2 * 10−5 DALY (ReCiPe endpoint with characterisation), 5) 2.8 * 10−7 to 3.5 * 10−7 (species.yr) (ReCiPe endpoint with characterisation), 6) 10.12 to 12.66 CTUe (USEtox: ecotoxicity). Overall, the results show that the feed for the pigs is responsible for the major part of the environmental impacts. More analytically, maize and soya are the components with the highest environmental impacts due to factors such as transportation, use of fertilisers and diesel fuel. The discussion about pig-production environmental impacts and the role of extensive pig farming is enriched with comparisons with the literature on pig-production LCA. Critical parameters are identified and discussed, with the aim of proposing solutions to reduce pork-production environmental impacts. Finally, the usefulness of the present study and future prospects are presented. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151900 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=279738
in Science of the Total Environment > vol. 808 (20 February 2022) . - p. 1-17[article] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / C. Lamnatou ; L.M. Plà-Aragonés ; D. Chemisana ; X. Ezcurra-Ciaurriz . - 2022 . - p. 1-17.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Science of the Total Environment > vol. 808 (20 February 2022) . - p. 1-17
Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire de l'Europe:Europe occidentale:Espagne ; A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agronomie:Culture du sol:Production alimentaire ; F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:Environmental impact ; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Biologie:Cycle de vie Mots-clés : 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de Production LIFE CYCLE LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS ANALYSE DU CYCLE DE VIE FARMING SYSTEM SYSTEME DE PRODUCTION FOOD PRODUCTION SWINE PORCIN HAMS JAMBON EXTENSIVE FARMING AGRICULTURE EXTENSIVE EXTENSIVE HUSBANDRY ELEVAGE EXTENSIF IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT SPAIN Résumé : Taking into account that in the literature on pork-production Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) there are a few studies about the Iberian pig, the present article evaluates an extensive (growing-fattening) Iberian-pig system in Spain, producing meat for Iberian ham and other quality-labelled products. The study has been based on Cumulative Energy Demand (CED), Global Warming Potential (GWP), ReCiPe (midpoint; endpoint) and USEtox (human toxicity; ecotoxicity). The analysis involves feed (for pigs and piglets), transportation, drinking water, straw usage and building materials (concrete). The impacts have been evaluated per kg of live or carcass weight (two functional units). The results show that the total impacts (per kg of live or carcass weight) range from: 1) 22.05 to 28.19 MJprim (CED), 2) 4.37 to 6.19 kg CO2.eq (GWP 20a, 100a and 500a), 3) 0.86 to 1.08 Pts (ReCiPe endpoint single-score, involving Human health, Ecosystems and Resources), 4) 9.9 * 10−6 to 1.2 * 10−5 DALY (ReCiPe endpoint with characterisation), 5) 2.8 * 10−7 to 3.5 * 10−7 (species.yr) (ReCiPe endpoint with characterisation), 6) 10.12 to 12.66 CTUe (USEtox: ecotoxicity). Overall, the results show that the feed for the pigs is responsible for the major part of the environmental impacts. More analytically, maize and soya are the components with the highest environmental impacts due to factors such as transportation, use of fertilisers and diesel fuel. The discussion about pig-production environmental impacts and the role of extensive pig farming is enriched with comparisons with the literature on pig-production LCA. Critical parameters are identified and discussed, with the aim of proposing solutions to reduce pork-production environmental impacts. Finally, the usefulness of the present study and future prospects are presented. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151900 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=279738
Titre : Pesticide dose adjustment in fruit and grapevine orchards by DOSA3D: fundamentals of the system and on-farm validation Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : C. Roman ; S. Planas ; P. Vilardell ; J. Cambray ; M. Tejerina ; J. Esteve ; M. Peris Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 1-15 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agriculture ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Matériaux et produits:Produit chimique:Produit phytochimique:Pesticide Mots-clés : 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.5 - Gestion des Exploitations PESTICIDES VITICULTURE VITICULTURE PLANT PROTECTION PROTECTION DES PLANTES INTEGRATED CONTROL LUTTE INTEGREE DECISION SUPPORT AIDE A LA DECISION REDUCTION DES PESTICIDES Résumé : Agricultural productivity cannot be sustained without the application of plant protection measures. Within the framework of integrated pest management (IPM), the use of chemical pesticides should be limited to the last option among the available practices. Even though their use remains common, it carries associated environmental and human health risks. One of the most accepted practices within IPM is the reduction of spraying events and/or pesticide applied doses. DOSA3D is a decision support system that allows the dose to be adjusted to the specific treatment scenario. For this, DOSA3D calculates the optimal application volume rate by estimating the leaf area index and takes into account the overall spraying efficiency and the pest or disease to be controlled. The system adopts specific minimum volume rates for fruit trees and vineyards without compromising the crop health status. To establish the adjusted dose, the labeled or the adviser prescription concentration is kept. Resulting adjusted doses provided by DOSA3D achieved pesticide savings up to 53% in fruit trees and 60% in vineyards. DOSA3D has been validated against the main diseases and pests of fruit trees and vineyards: brown spot and psylla in pear orchards; alternaria blotch disease, apple scab, codling moth, oriental moth and red spider mite in apple orchards; powdery mildew, brown rot, aphids, thrips and mites in peach orchards; and, powdery mildew, yellow spider mite and leafhoppers in grapevine orchards. In addition, a methodology called Green Way is presented to provide consistent and crop safety pesticide doses when these are labeled as concentration or ground area doses. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152158 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=279740
in Science of the Total Environment > vol. 808 (20 February 2022) . - p. 1-15[article] Pesticide dose adjustment in fruit and grapevine orchards by DOSA3D: fundamentals of the system and on-farm validation [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / C. Roman ; S. Planas ; P. Vilardell ; J. Cambray ; M. Tejerina ; J. Esteve ; M. Peris . - 2022 . - p. 1-15.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Science of the Total Environment > vol. 808 (20 February 2022) . - p. 1-15
Catégories : A HISTOIRE - Pays et ensemble de pays:Histoire du Monde Rural:Agriculture ; C ECONOMIE - ECONOMIE SOCIALE ET SOLIDAIRE:Matériaux et produits:Produit chimique:Produit phytochimique:Pesticide Mots-clés : 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES 6.5 - Gestion des Exploitations PESTICIDES VITICULTURE VITICULTURE PLANT PROTECTION PROTECTION DES PLANTES INTEGRATED CONTROL LUTTE INTEGREE DECISION SUPPORT AIDE A LA DECISION REDUCTION DES PESTICIDES Résumé : Agricultural productivity cannot be sustained without the application of plant protection measures. Within the framework of integrated pest management (IPM), the use of chemical pesticides should be limited to the last option among the available practices. Even though their use remains common, it carries associated environmental and human health risks. One of the most accepted practices within IPM is the reduction of spraying events and/or pesticide applied doses. DOSA3D is a decision support system that allows the dose to be adjusted to the specific treatment scenario. For this, DOSA3D calculates the optimal application volume rate by estimating the leaf area index and takes into account the overall spraying efficiency and the pest or disease to be controlled. The system adopts specific minimum volume rates for fruit trees and vineyards without compromising the crop health status. To establish the adjusted dose, the labeled or the adviser prescription concentration is kept. Resulting adjusted doses provided by DOSA3D achieved pesticide savings up to 53% in fruit trees and 60% in vineyards. DOSA3D has been validated against the main diseases and pests of fruit trees and vineyards: brown spot and psylla in pear orchards; alternaria blotch disease, apple scab, codling moth, oriental moth and red spider mite in apple orchards; powdery mildew, brown rot, aphids, thrips and mites in peach orchards; and, powdery mildew, yellow spider mite and leafhoppers in grapevine orchards. In addition, a methodology called Green Way is presented to provide consistent and crop safety pesticide doses when these are labeled as concentration or ground area doses. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152158 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=279740
Titre : Towards a comprehensive sustainability methodology to assess anthropogenic impacts on ecosystems: review of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Risk Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessment Type de document : objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ... Auteurs : L.V. De Luca Peña ; S.E. Taelman ; J. Dewulf ; G. Everaert ; S. Hernandez Lucas ; M. Custódio ; K. Van der Biest ; L. Boone ; N. Préat Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 1-17 Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng) Catégories : F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:Environmental impact ; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Ressources naturelles:Écosystème The system of interdependent complex of plant and animal populations within a particular geographic content, generally an area of uniform environmental conditions.; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Sciences de l'environnement et ingénierie:Environnement ; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Sciences de l'environnement et ingénierie:Gestion de l'environnementMots-clés : 07 - ENVIRONNEMENT 7.1 - Généralités. Situation Environnementale ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT EVALUATION IMPACT SUR ENVIRONNEMENT METHODS METHODE SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE ECOSYSTEM LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS ANALYSE DU CYCLE DE VIE RISK RISQUE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SERVICE ECOSYSTEMIQUE RISQUE ENVIRONNEMENTAL Résumé : Nowadays, a variety of methodologies are available to assess local, regional and global impacts of human activities on ecosystems, which include Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) and Ecosystem Services Assessment (ESA). However, none can individually assess both the positive and negative impacts of human activities at different geographical scales in a comprehensive manner. In order to overcome the shortcomings of each methodology and develop more holistic assessments, the integration of these methodologies is essential. Several studies have attempted to integrate these methodologies either conceptually or through applied case studies. To understand why, how and to what extent these methodologies have been integrated, a total of 110 relevant publications were reviewed. The analysis of the case studies showed that the integration can occur at different positions along the cause-effect chain and from this, a classification scheme was proposed to characterize the different integration approaches. Three categories of integration are distinguished: post-analysis, integration through the combination of results, and integration through the complementation of a driving method. The literature review highlights that the most recurrent type of integration is the latter. While the integration through the complementation of a driving method is more realistic and accurate compared to the other two categories, its development is more complex and a higher data requirement could be needed. In addition to this, there is always the risk of double-counting for all the approaches. None of the integration approaches can be categorized as a full integration, but this is not necessarily needed to have a comprehensive assessment. The most essential aspect is to select the appropriate components from each methodology that can cover both the environmental and socioeconomic costs and benefits of human activities on the ecosystems. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152125 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=279744
in Science of the Total Environment > vol. 808 (20 February 2022) . - p. 1-17[article] Towards a comprehensive sustainability methodology to assess anthropogenic impacts on ecosystems: review of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Risk Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessment [objet à 3 dimensions, artefacts, ...] / L.V. De Luca Peña ; S.E. Taelman ; J. Dewulf ; G. Everaert ; S. Hernandez Lucas ; M. Custódio ; K. Van der Biest ; L. Boone ; N. Préat . - 2022 . - p. 1-17.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Langues originales : Anglais (eng)
in Science of the Total Environment > vol. 808 (20 February 2022) . - p. 1-17
Catégories : F POPULATIONS - ETUDES DE CAS:Environmental impact ; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Ressources naturelles:Écosystème The system of interdependent complex of plant and animal populations within a particular geographic content, generally an area of uniform environmental conditions.; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Sciences de l'environnement et ingénierie:Environnement ; S SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES:Sciences de l'environnement et ingénierie:Gestion de l'environnementMots-clés : 07 - ENVIRONNEMENT 7.1 - Généralités. Situation Environnementale ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT EVALUATION IMPACT SUR ENVIRONNEMENT METHODS METHODE SUSTAINABILITY DURABILITE ECOSYSTEM LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS ANALYSE DU CYCLE DE VIE RISK RISQUE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SERVICE ECOSYSTEMIQUE RISQUE ENVIRONNEMENTAL Résumé : Nowadays, a variety of methodologies are available to assess local, regional and global impacts of human activities on ecosystems, which include Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) and Ecosystem Services Assessment (ESA). However, none can individually assess both the positive and negative impacts of human activities at different geographical scales in a comprehensive manner. In order to overcome the shortcomings of each methodology and develop more holistic assessments, the integration of these methodologies is essential. Several studies have attempted to integrate these methodologies either conceptually or through applied case studies. To understand why, how and to what extent these methodologies have been integrated, a total of 110 relevant publications were reviewed. The analysis of the case studies showed that the integration can occur at different positions along the cause-effect chain and from this, a classification scheme was proposed to characterize the different integration approaches. Three categories of integration are distinguished: post-analysis, integration through the combination of results, and integration through the complementation of a driving method. The literature review highlights that the most recurrent type of integration is the latter. While the integration through the complementation of a driving method is more realistic and accurate compared to the other two categories, its development is more complex and a higher data requirement could be needed. In addition to this, there is always the risk of double-counting for all the approaches. None of the integration approaches can be categorized as a full integration, but this is not necessarily needed to have a comprehensive assessment. The most essential aspect is to select the appropriate components from each methodology that can cover both the environmental and socioeconomic costs and benefits of human activities on the ecosystems. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152125 Permalink : https://cs.iut.univ-tours.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=279744
